Materiality
recent-searches
Enlaces rápidos
Materiality assessment
Click on the buttons below to navigate the page:
Double materiality
Impact
Materiality as represented by our impacts on the economy, the environment and people, including human rights; and
Financial
The potential to affect financial performance and value creation.
Materiality at Vale
Photo: Vale's Archive
Material Issues GRI 3-2
- Our ESG Databook contains fact sheets providing a detailed overview of each topic and information on how we engage with our stakeholders.
- Our 2023 Integrated Report contains a table mapping each topic to the relevant standard disclosures, frameworks, pillars, risks, opportunities, and challenges.
* Crosscutting to all the material themes
Materiality process overview
We reviewed external documents and literature to identify whether any industry-relevant topics were not included in Vale’s material topics and need to be incorporated in the current review cycle. This step confirmed that our material topics are inclusive of all key aspects from both a corporate and an industry perspective.
In addition, as part of our commitment to understanding and capturing the perspectives of our stakeholders, we regularly conduct perception surveys regarding Vale’s Sustainability performance. In 2023, we conducted 50 in-depth interviews and a quantitative survey involving over 190 representatives from diverse groups, including academics, clients, suppliers, multilaterals, and regulatory entities. When compared to our industry peers, the general public perceives us to be on par with the sector’s average.
Conversely, among those subject to in-depth interviews, there is a more favorable perception of Vale’s sustainability performance, with 50% considering it above average. However, this positive perception is not uniformly reflected in terms of trust in the company. When analysing the results of the general public’s confidence, compared to 2021, there was a 9% increase in perception in Brazil.
Within this audience, 33% express a high level of trust, while 41% maintain a moderate level of trust. When asked, the primary drivers for a moderate level of trust mentioned were the company’s response to the impacts of Brumadinho and Mariana, as well as the perception that the company does not consistently act in the best interest of society.
It is essential to highlight that stakeholders also recognize Vale’s engagement efforts and demand for an increasingly closer relationship to strengthen communication and active listening. Among the identified opportunities is the necessity for more focused communication and a narrative directed towards the outcomes of our initiatives, along with the potential to demonstrate our role in forest restoration and protection, sustainable mining practices, and dam management.
The assessment of financial materiality gathered information from various public sources, including Vale’s disclosures to investors and institutional and ESG websites. Additionally, insights were derived from monitoring litigation, controversies, our corporate strategy and our 2030 commitments.
Furthermore, we made efforts to integrate these assessments into our risk management methodology and criteria. Although in the initial stages, these efforts will be further developed in the upcoming materiality review cycle.